Comments on: james welling vs adobe illustrator cs http://nastynets.com/?p=535 internet surfing club Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:34:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: tom moody http://nastynets.com/?p=535&cpage=1#comment-3304 tom moody Sat, 14 Apr 2007 06:14:06 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=535#comment-3304 Technique--bah humbug. Just learned that Welling moved "up" to David Zwirner and thus has a solid NY presence. D'oh. I hope they sold a lot of those flowers. Technique–bah humbug.

Just learned that Welling moved “up” to David Zwirner and thus has a solid NY presence. D’oh. I hope they sold a lot of those flowers.

]]> By: johnny rocket http://nastynets.com/?p=535&cpage=1#comment-3205 johnny rocket Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:20:05 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=535#comment-3205 I believe that these are photograms. And therefore fairly impressive in their technique. I believe that these are photograms. And therefore fairly impressive in their technique.

]]> By: tom moody http://nastynets.com/?p=535&cpage=1#comment-3167 tom moody Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:23:43 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=535#comment-3167 Having seen Welling's work in NY at Jay Gorney and other places (and not having seen it for a while) I thought of him doing mostly black and white stuff like this: <img src="http://www.nastynets.com/secretstash/welling1.jpg"> So I had to google to realize he was now doing this: <img src="http://www.nastynets.com/secretstash/2005%20WELJA0203.200.jpg"> Looking at Google images he's all over the place but if these Adobe Illustrator-type floral silhouettes with color gradients are now his signature style this is not good. Good catch on the similarity. Having seen Welling’s work in NY at Jay Gorney and other places (and not having seen it for a while) I thought of him doing mostly black and white stuff like this:

So I had to google to realize he was now doing this:

Looking at Google images he’s all over the place but if these Adobe Illustrator-type floral silhouettes with color gradients are now his signature style this is not good. Good catch on the similarity.

]]>