Comments on: 2001 2006 http://nastynets.com/?p=412 internet surfing club Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:34:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Fort Walt http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-8114 Fort Walt Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:34:35 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-8114 Cheers to another day and mornings. God Bless. and maybe its a tad more healthy to listen to reggae. oh well Cheers to another day and mornings. God Bless. and maybe its a tad more healthy to listen to reggae. oh well

]]> By: guthrie http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-914 guthrie Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:50:46 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-914 I am a tad confused about Rhizome's audience, and actually surprised that professional surfer/nasty nets type stuff gets as much attention as it does, so i dont know what to think about whats going on over there. the net art is shifting ... but does that mean the audience shifts as well? I am a tad confused about Rhizome’s audience, and actually surprised that professional surfer/nasty nets type stuff gets as much attention as it does, so i dont know what to think about whats going on over there. the net art is shifting … but does that mean the audience shifts as well?

]]> By: tom moody http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-912 tom moody Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:34:59 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-912 Oh, never mind, I give up. Oh, never mind, I give up.

]]> By: tom moody http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-864 tom moody Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:25:35 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-864 AFC (see above): "Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that five hundred new sites have been added to the Rhizome ArtBase — Sonya Nielson’s Antediluvian Fragments of Memories; thank God her “interaction with squares” was brought to my attention via the reblog — but there’s a problem in Internet curation when that work appears on the main page and Lonergan’s does not." Can we discuss this? Do you think Johnson's question is invalid? Out of line? Rude? Is Guthrie's piece in fact "the first great art piece that manipulates YouTube software"? Guthrie is exempt from weighing in on the historical importance of his own piece but how about others? What do people at Rhizome think of Johnson's comparison of Sonya Nielson vs Guthrie? Anything? Nothing? AFC (see above): “Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that five hundred new sites have been added to the Rhizome ArtBase — Sonya Nielson’s Antediluvian Fragments of Memories; thank God her “interaction with squares” was brought to my attention via the reblog — but there’s a problem in Internet curation when that work appears on the main page and Lonergan’s does not.”

Can we discuss this? Do you think Johnson’s question is invalid? Out of line? Rude? Is Guthrie’s piece in fact “the first great art piece that manipulates YouTube software”? Guthrie is exempt from weighing in on the historical importance of his own piece but how about others? What do people at Rhizome think of Johnson’s comparison of Sonya Nielson vs Guthrie? Anything? Nothing?

]]> By: Art Fag City » The Future was Posted Four Days Ago http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-812 Art Fag City » The Future was Posted Four Days Ago Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:37:49 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-812 [...] The Future was Posted Four Days Ago Guthri Lonergan, Nasty Nets, 20012006 Screengrab AFC [...] [...] The Future was Posted Four Days Ago Guthri Lonergan, Nasty Nets, 20012006 Screengrab AFC [...]

]]> By: Art Fag City » Blog Archive » Guthrie Lonergan’s 20012006 Still Waiting For Reblogging http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-810 Art Fag City » Blog Archive » Guthrie Lonergan’s 20012006 Still Waiting For Reblogging Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:52:09 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-810 [...] It seems a little odd to me that Guthrie Lonergan posted the first great art piece that manipulates YouTube software last Monday on Nasty Nets (my description here), and it hasn’t received institutional support from either of the new media reblog sites in the city. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that five hundred new sites have been added to the Rhizome ArtBase — Sonya Nielson’s Antediluvian Fragments of Memories; thank God her “interaction with squares” was brought to my attention via the reblog — but there’s a problem in Internet curation when that work appears on the main page and Lonergan’s does not. In Rhizome’s defense “Professional Surfer“, (a show that considers web surfing an art form) includes the site nasty nets, and by extension the Lonergan piece, but the exhibition suffers from the same problem any link in a side bar has — nobody pays attention to it for long. Certainly, I have not had calls from the artists I included in the Emerging Artist Series thanking me for the attention they continue to receive as a result of being listed in mine. [...] [...] It seems a little odd to me that Guthrie Lonergan posted the first great art piece that manipulates YouTube software last Monday on Nasty Nets (my description here), and it hasn’t received institutional support from either of the new media reblog sites in the city. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that five hundred new sites have been added to the Rhizome ArtBase — Sonya Nielson’s Antediluvian Fragments of Memories; thank God her “interaction with squares” was brought to my attention via the reblog — but there’s a problem in Internet curation when that work appears on the main page and Lonergan’s does not. In Rhizome’s defense “Professional Surfer“, (a show that considers web surfing an art form) includes the site nasty nets, and by extension the Lonergan piece, but the exhibition suffers from the same problem any link in a side bar has — nobody pays attention to it for long. Certainly, I have not had calls from the artists I included in the Emerging Artist Series thanking me for the attention they continue to receive as a result of being listed in mine. [...]

]]> By: tom moody http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-747 tom moody Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:28:52 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-747 Guthrie, the world owes you a big debt of gratitude for this use of CSS positioning. I guess there's some art thing going on but you can't expect busy webworkers to like, think and stuff. Guthrie, the world owes you a big debt of gratitude for this use of CSS positioning.
I guess there’s some art thing going on but you can’t expect busy webworkers to like, think and stuff.

]]> By: pupsintrouble http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-742 pupsintrouble Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:19:50 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-742 wow. wow.

]]> By: Nasty Nets used CSS positioning to "embed” one YouTube video… http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-739 Nasty Nets used CSS positioning to "embed” one YouTube video… Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:21:03 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-739 [...] Nasty Nets used CSS positioning to “embed” one YouTube video into another. “Be sure to hit ‘play’ on both YouTubes.” Reminds me of the animated GIF mashups (more). (link) [...] [...] Nasty Nets used CSS positioning to “embed” one YouTube video into another. “Be sure to hit ‘play’ on both YouTubes.” Reminds me of the animated GIF mashups (more). (link) [...]

]]> By: VIDEO: Can You Embed Two YouTube Videos On Top Of Each Other? Answer: YES. » Cool Videos at Brohans Video Blog http://nastynets.com/?p=412&cpage=1#comment-738 VIDEO: Can You Embed Two YouTube Videos On Top Of Each Other? Answer: YES. » Cool Videos at Brohans Video Blog Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:18:18 +0000 http://nastynets.com/?p=412#comment-738 [...] Link [Hat Tip: Kottke] [...] [...] Link [Hat Tip: Kottke] [...]

]]>