login

2001 <<<>>> 2006

(be sure to hit “play” on both YouTubes..)

 
  1/29/07 2:27 am




14 Comments »


OMFG!

- joel — 1/29/07 @ 2:17 pm


Awesome!!!

- Mau — 1/29/07 @ 4:04 pm


[...] http://nastynets.com/?p=412 [...]

- YouTube u YouTubeu by CSS « o nekim stvarima govoreći — 1/30/07 @ 2:10 am


nice. (hi to sandoz)

- wetwebwork — 1/30/07 @ 9:09 am


[...] Link [Hat Tip: Kottke] [...]

- VIDEO: Can You Embed Two YouTube Videos On Top Of Each Other? Answer: YES. » Cool Videos at Brohans Video Blog — 1/30/07 @ 9:18 am


[...] Nasty Nets used CSS positioning to “embed” one YouTube video into another. “Be sure to hit ‘play’ on both YouTubes.” Reminds me of the animated GIF mashups (more). (link) [...]

- Nasty Nets used CSS positioning to "embed” one YouTube video… — 1/30/07 @ 9:21 am


wow.

- pupsintrouble — 1/30/07 @ 3:19 pm


Guthrie, the world owes you a big debt of gratitude for this use of CSS positioning.
I guess there’s some art thing going on but you can’t expect busy webworkers to like, think and stuff.

- tom moody — 1/30/07 @ 8:28 pm


[...] It seems a little odd to me that Guthrie Lonergan posted the first great art piece that manipulates YouTube software last Monday on Nasty Nets (my description here), and it hasn’t received institutional support from either of the new media reblog sites in the city. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that five hundred new sites have been added to the Rhizome ArtBase — Sonya Nielson’s Antediluvian Fragments of Memories; thank God her “interaction with squares” was brought to my attention via the reblog — but there’s a problem in Internet curation when that work appears on the main page and Lonergan’s does not. In Rhizome’s defense “Professional Surfer“, (a show that considers web surfing an art form) includes the site nasty nets, and by extension the Lonergan piece, but the exhibition suffers from the same problem any link in a side bar has — nobody pays attention to it for long. Certainly, I have not had calls from the artists I included in the Emerging Artist Series thanking me for the attention they continue to receive as a result of being listed in mine. [...]

- Art Fag City » Blog Archive » Guthrie Lonergan’s 20012006 Still Waiting For Reblogging — 2/5/07 @ 5:52 am


[...] The Future was Posted Four Days Ago Guthri Lonergan, Nasty Nets, 20012006 Screengrab AFC [...]

- Art Fag City » The Future was Posted Four Days Ago — 2/5/07 @ 6:37 am


AFC (see above): “Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that five hundred new sites have been added to the Rhizome ArtBase — Sonya Nielson’s Antediluvian Fragments of Memories; thank God her “interaction with squares” was brought to my attention via the reblog — but there’s a problem in Internet curation when that work appears on the main page and Lonergan’s does not.”

Can we discuss this? Do you think Johnson’s question is invalid? Out of line? Rude? Is Guthrie’s piece in fact “the first great art piece that manipulates YouTube software”? Guthrie is exempt from weighing in on the historical importance of his own piece but how about others? What do people at Rhizome think of Johnson’s comparison of Sonya Nielson vs Guthrie? Anything? Nothing?

- tom moody — 2/9/07 @ 10:25 am


Oh, never mind, I give up.

- tom moody — 2/11/07 @ 10:34 pm


I am a tad confused about Rhizome’s audience, and actually surprised that professional surfer/nasty nets type stuff gets as much attention as it does, so i dont know what to think about whats going on over there. the net art is shifting … but does that mean the audience shifts as well?

- guthrie — 2/11/07 @ 11:50 pm


Cheers to another day and mornings. God Bless. and maybe its a tad more healthy to listen to reggae. oh well

- Fort Walt — 2/4/09 @ 4:34 am




RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

  • Login first if you are a user!
  • If a guest, please use form below (BTW, some basic html works, not img tags yet)