The Rhizome Digest merged into the Rhizome News in November 2008. These pages serve as an archive for 6-years worth of discussions and happenings from when the Digest was simply a plain-text, weekly email.

Subject: RHIZOME DIGEST: 2.04.05
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:28:33 -0800

RHIZOME DIGEST: February 4, 2005


1. Just opened: "VIDEO/AUDIO INTERACTION" curated by Brian
2. Pall Thayer: [Fwd: crash symposium/sound event london feb 11 2005]
3. Jo-Anne Green: Turbulence Guest Curator: "Pop Up" by Abe Linkoln

4. joy.garnett AT FWD: Two Tenure-Track Faculty Positions in Digital
Media (CUNY)
5. Steve Dietz: ISEA2006 Symposium and residency call

6. Pall Thayer: CNU (Creamedfishsoup'sNotUnix)
7. christopher otto: all time project
8. Curt Cloninger: Synesthetic Bubblegum Cards: Set 5: The Ornamental Pack

9. Trebor: The ABC\'s of Conferencing. Experiment, Play, Reflect
10. Edward Picot: Payments for Web Art?

+commissioned for
11. David Senior: Sharing = Caring

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 1.31.05
From: <webmaster AT>
Subject: Just opened: "VIDEO/AUDIO INTERACTION" curated by Brian Schwab

Just opened ...

+ Curated by Brian Schwab +


+ + +
Rhizome ArtBase curation allows any Rhizome member to
curate an exhibit from works in the ArtBase. Go to to see a list of all open exhibits.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.01.05
From: Pall Thayer <palli AT>
Subject: [Fwd: crash symposium/sound event london feb 11 2005]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: crash symposium/sound event london feb 11 2005
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:16:30 +0000
From: m AT
To: crashingp AT

crash feb 11th 2005 london uk
crash revelations for holographic binding OS
crash forced expanded opening for new post-software-art
crash melancholia and fascism
crash post humanist ontology
crash abstraction + machinic representation
crash auto-destructive art relation to the computational
crash self-coded post-algorithmic constructivist noise performance

crash florian cramer, stewart home, otto e roessler, anthony moore,
sunny bains, dick j bierman, lisa
jevbratt, martin howse, jonathan kemp

crash andy bolus, russell haswell, yves degoyon, erich berger, ap,
stillupsteypa, farmers manual, kaffe
matthews, pita

crash shoreditch town hall london ec1 [on door £3 / online £3,33] 10 am
crash ica london sw1 [tickets through ica 02079303647] 8.30 pm
crash crashing AT
crash ap project supported by arts council england, smal + mute


crash is a unique event exposing a radical new space for post-software
art and examining links to
theories of endodata, holographic programming and auto-destructive art.

crash builds from two components, a one day symposium at shoreditch town
hall with speakers including
florian cramer, stewart home, dick j bierman, lisa jevbratt and otto
roessler. the evening component at
the ica collides theory with practice, combining constructivist noise,
self-coded applications and
self-constructed hardware. participating international artists include
pita, farmers manual, yves
degoyon, andy bolus, ap, erich berger, stillupsteypa, kaffe matthews and
russell haswell.

crash necessary apologies for cross-posting / crash please disseminate

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Rhizome is now offering organizational subscriptions, memberships
purchased at the institutional level. These subscriptions allow
participants of an institution to access Rhizome's services without
having to purchase individual memberships. (Rhizome is also offering
subsidized memberships to qualifying institutions in poor or excluded
communities.) Please visit for more
information or contact Kevin McGarry at Kevin AT or Rachel Greene
at Rachel AT

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.04.05
From: Jo-Anne Green <jo AT>
Subject: Turbulence Guest Curator: "Pop Up" by Abe Linkoln

February 4, 2005
Turbulence Guest Curator: "Pop Up" by Abe Linkoln

>From the "Pop Up Manifesto":

1. First click, best click?
?7. Like a ballet mecanique digitales, a pop up window's location and timing
is never random?Any appearance of chaos, is?an appearance. It is crucial
that we stay calm?do not scare them away?they sense fear and can react
either by running away or by stomping you to death?
?9. The gauntlet is hereby thrown down?


Abe Linkoln is a net artist and net curator. Recent works include "My
Boyfriend Came Back From the War (Abe Linkoln's 2004 Blog Mix)" featured in
the Last Real Net Art Museum, "Netflix" featured in Altx's HyperX gallery,
and he is constantly updating on the multimedia blog

For more Turbulence Guest Curators, see

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.01.05
From: <joy.garnett AT>
Subject: FWD: Two Tenure-Track Faculty Positions in Digital Media (CUNY)

-----Original Message-----
From: Dutton, Sonia
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Garnett, Joy
Subject: didya see this? =)


Digital Media
Two Tenure-Track Faculty Positions
City University of New York Graduate Center

The City University of New York, the nation's largest public urban
university, is pleased to announce two tenure-track faculty positions
in digital media that will be filled as soon as September 2005. CUNY
has identified digital media as a Flagship Program within its
nineteen-campus system that it intends to enhance and expand over the
next two years.

Candidates for these positions must demonstrate broad experience in
using and creating digital media in artistic and/or academic settings,
a strong research agenda in various aspects of digital media
production and use, and a commitment to teaching and academic
achievement in digital media. A doctorate or a terminal degree in an
appropriate field is required. The positions are available at the
Assistant, Associate, and Professor levels, commensurate with the
experience and qualifications of the candidates.

Hunter College

Digital Media Maker with emphasis on using media to enhance public
awareness, in the M.F.A.

Program in Integrated Media Arts offering Advanced Studies in
Nonfiction Media Making Individual must have related teaching
experience and demonstrate competence in two or more areas of digital
and electronic forms of creative investigation and public expression,
including: experimental imaging/interaction systems, robotics, mobile
computing, networked spaces, web applications, animation, video,
interactive/machine interfaces, programming, performance, installation
and 3-D.

Applicant should be familiar with electronic media theory and
contemporary art practice. We seek an individual whose creative
research demonstrates a deep understanding of the relationship between
emerging technologies and contemporary media art, experimental and
hybrid media practices and models, and theoretical, socio-cultural,
and historical discourse.

NYC College of Technology

The Entertainment Technology Department of the School of Technology and

The successful candidate will be an innovative entertainment
technology practitioner and educator with practical and teaching
experience in one or more of the following areas: Scenic Automation,
Motion Control, and Mechanisms Design/Development; Physical computing
applied to real-time systems of distributed devices; Animatronics and
Robotics; Interactive Installation and Virtual Environment Technology;
or Video/Visual Media Presentation Systems.

Related experience in digital audio/video, software engineering,
computer-aided design, or electromechanical devices is an asset as is
experience in artistic and cultural presentation. Academic/teaching
experience is advantageous and will be a major part of this position.
A minimum of three years professional experience is expected. The
position offers an opportunity to play a key role in curriculum
development for multidisciplinary courses and program-level projects.
The position will be housed within the Entertainment Technology
Department, and be cross-disciplinary with the Computer Systems
Technology, Computer Engineering Technology and/or Mechanical
Engineering Technology departments, including possible teaching
assignments in these departments.

Applicants must state which position(s) they are applying for. Send a
letter describing qualifications, experience and research agenda with
vita and names of three references to:

Dr. Stephen Brier, Associate Provost for Instructional Technology and Chair

Digital Media Cluster Hiring Initiative * The Graduate Center, CUNY

365 Fifth Ave., Rm. 8111 * New York, NY 10016

Applicants for more than one position should include duplicate
materials. Applications will be forwarded to the search committee at
the appropriate college(s); review of applications will begin
immediately. The searches will continue until the positions are

GUNY is an AA/EO employer M/F/D/V

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Rhizome Member-curated Exhibits

View online exhibits Rhizome members have curated from works in the ArtBase,
or learn how to create your own exhibit.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.02.05
From: Steve Dietz <mediachef AT>
Subject: ISEA2006 Symposium and residency call

The ISEA2006 Symposium is being held in conjunction with the first biennial
ZeroOne San Jose Global Festival for Art on the Edge in San Jose,
California, August 5-13, 2006. The themes for the Symposium and Festival
are: Interactive City, Community Domain, Pacific Rim, and Transvergence. See for more details.

We are announcing an open call for an airport residency project in
conjunction with the Symposium. Future calls will be announced over the next
6 weeks. See for more information.

The City of San Jose Public Art Program, in collaboration with the San Jose
Airport Department is pleased to announce an artist residency program as
part of the ISEA2006 Symposium and ZeroOne San Jose: A Global Festival of
Art on the Edge being held in August 2006. The outcome of the residency is
to create a project that activates the Airport as a gateway to the
community--local, global, and festival. The primary presentation of this
residency project will be on the San Jose International Airport property.

To sign up for future announcements and to receive periodic updates about
the Symposium and Festival, subscribe to the ISEA2006 list at

Save the dates: August 5-13, 2006.

Steve Dietz
ISEA2006 Symposium
ZeroOne San Jose: A Global Festival of Art on the Edge

Joel Slayton
ISEA2006 Symposium
ZeroOne San Jose: A Global Festival of Art on the Edge

Beau Takahara
ISEA2006 Symposium
ZeroOne San Jose: A Global Festival of Art on the Edge

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.01.05
From: Pall Thayer <palli AT>
Subject: CNU (Creamedfishsoup'sNotUnix)

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.03.05
From: christopher otto <thisisfresh AT>
Subject: all time project

reading the thread about color clocks made me want to experiment with
something ive had lying around for awhile - Ive been interested in
time compression and kind of outrageous layering. so this morning I
made a quick sketch in javascript of it:

ALL TIME(2004)

IE ONLY - it's the only browser with css filters i think:(

(i put an explanation of what it does in the source)

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.04.05
From: Curt Cloninger <curt AT>
Subject: Synesthetic Bubblegum Cards: Set 5: The Ornamental Pack

New Work:

The fifth set of Synesthetic Bubble Gum Cards is now available:

Source visuals by:
anonymous Celtic scribes
various outsider artists
various Islamic artists
various graffiti writers
various Maori tatau artists
and Walter Inglis Anderson

Source audio by:
Devendra Banhart
Joanna Newsom
Sufjan Stevens

Previous sets may be gotten at:


+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.02.05
From: Trebor <trebor AT>
Subject: The ABC\'s of Conferencing. Experiment, Play, Reflect

The ABC's of Conferencing. Experiment, Play, Reflect
by Trebor Scholz & Geert Lovink

People love conferences. They can't get enough of all the offline events on
offer. Like festivals, conferences are venues where you can meet future
collaborators, debate ideas and artworks, party intensely, get inspired,
provoked, learn, make new friends, and then occasionally carry on the
dialogue in the sauna. These days, the event industry is an integral part of
the shopping-driven locative spectacle. Conferences are also an opportunity
for people who can't meet otherwise, to spend a few days together away from
their obligations, zooming in on ideas. Whereas, socially speaking,
conferences may be exciting, most events use conventional, unreflected
formats. In this essay we investigate why this is the case and what
alternative models are available to disrupt the everyday consensus machine.
Beyond good or evil, conferences are here to stay, so they better be good.

Critique of Panelism
For a moment let's not focus on what people like or do not like. We were
always looking for conferences free of keynote speeches and panels. It's a
relief to see speakers argue freely, be brief - leaving ample time for
questions from the audience, and focus on the points raised by the chair of
a session. Formats and the vocabulary used lock us not only into structures
but also impact the way we develop content. In the age of the Internet
'rhetoric', we can feel free to move on, away from reading a 'paper' to more
distributed and collaborative forms of discourse production, discussion and
dispute. The ritualized academic structure of panels and the
non-communicative form of the keynote speaker feed into the celebrity system
reinforcing hegemonic paradigms that get in the way of genuine dialogue and
of diverse, emerging voices being heard. Some will read this criticism as an
attack on the scientific community as a whole. We disagree. Academics are
not a species in danger of extinction and it is time to get out of the
defensive mode. Panelism is part of the dark side of 'academism' and needs
to be addressed, exactly because it is spilling over to other contexts such
as the arts, culture, new media and even activism.
A good example of well meant but misplaced panelism is the Intersociety for
Electronic Arts (ISEA), a bi-annual conference, a somewhat tragic event in
which artists have to participate in scientific formats in order to
contribute. In part this is an effect of the forced 'edufication' of the
arts, particularly in the United States, but increasingly also in countries
such as Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Within the American
'university of excellence' (1) language and research formats in the arts are
modeled increasingly after the business logic of the sciences. People who
decide about grants in turn are looking at the military-industrial complex
that supports them to an ever-growing extent. The possibility of failure,
even in the sciences becomes almost impossible due to an all-powerful result
imperative. Instead of addressing this topic directly, a culture of academic
simulation is being introduced in which a wide range, from designers,
programmers and activists to net artists are persuaded to respond to 'call
for papers,' motivate each other to submit a 'proposal for a panel' and even
have to buy into the dirty business of (blind) peer reviewing, enforcing
lengthy citations, in order to get something 'published' on a website.
Increasingly, dull formats of the sciences are imposed on the arts. Mind
you, these are mostly unnecessary, 'alien' formats that no one would come up
with on their own. There is by no means a 'natural' desire amongst artists
to sit in panels and write 'papers.' In fact, these formats are despised--
but nonetheless hard to resist. We do not suggest that artists cannot speak
for themselves or should not be involved in practices embracing theory and
production, or arts and sciences. But we do question the forced adaptation
of scientific formats and argue that it is high time to start public
awareness, openly talk about it and label the occurring tendency by its
proper names: paperism and panelism.

What's so bad about three or four people, each sitting on their individual
hobby horses, introduced by an ill-informed chair of the session far distant
from the divulged audience? The fact that the panelists do not know each
other and have not seen let alone read each other's 'papers'? The fact that
there was hardly time for questions? Who cares? Exactly. Who cares? We do.
We, the audience, are those who care. We have to say no to the supermarket
mentality in which both audience and presenters are merely shopping around,
not showing up on panels, are clearly programmed in the wrong section of the
program or have no ability, or even wish, to addressing the handful of
people in the hall in a clear manner.

The source of 'panelism' has to be located at conference organizers, not
speakers, let alone the audience. What panelism expresses is laziness and a
lack of creative thinking as to which format in what (discursive) situation
will work best. Panelism is often an indication that too many people have
been involved in the decision making process. The panel structure is the
flipside of justified attempts to be more inclusive and have as many
speakers as possible. But that doesn't always result in interesting events.
The best conferences are being produced by a small team of both researchers
and producers that closely collaborate. Events curated by one individual,
such as Ars Electronica, have the tendency to become narrow and repetitive
and develop an informal circuit of guessing and gossiping around the
intentions of this one person, much like Documenta and the biennial system
with its small group of circulating curators.

The worst panels are those when speakers really have no clue why they are in
the same session. Or take this situation: a competitive, slightly irritated
atmosphere arises when the first speaker goes over her time limit, then the
second as well, leaving no time for the last one. A variation of this would
be the case in which the last speaker 'eats up' all the remaining time for
questions. Another general pattern is the fact that the last speaker gets
most of the questions as the audience has forgotten what the previous
panelists had to say. These problems can only partially be solved by a good
moderator. The key issue here is not the all too human qualities of certain
subjects but the deep liberal, unfocused approach in which the topics might,
at best, be described as a cloud of question marks. The audience in response
develops a liberal, 'surfing' attitude towards the 'collage' of information
that is presented, a mechanism so precisely described by Marshall McLuhan.
There is no compelling reason why panel members would have to discuss with
each other. Usually they have been introduced minutes before they start and
can barely remember each other's name. And while all this happens the
audience sits as a silent block in the dark.
Maybe we missed something and only have been at events where there was
nothing at stake. Perhaps there is a universal human right to present one's
paper in public. We are being told that in this democratic idea science
should be seen as a bazaar full of mediocre but necessary products in which
it is up to diehards to find the precious gems. Noise to signal ratios are
varying greatly and one has to learn to filter in order to get through.
Keynote speakers do not make up for the tragedy of panelism. They only
mirror the problem and try to compensate for the middle of the road
methodology that creates artificial celebrity. Reputation does not exist, it
has to be made, and the keynote system is an ideal vehicle to do so.

The Search for Alternatives
Before we slide into radical negativism, let's focus on alternatives. The
FreeCooperation conference that we recently organized (2) took place on a
campus of the State University of New York, late April 2004. The topic of
the event was the art of (online) collaboration. From cell phones to email,
and multiplayer online games, mailing lists, weblogs (3), and wikis (4) our
everyday lives are increasingly enmeshed with technology. This at least is
true for societies benefiting from the globalization of the information
order. The necessity to examine what happens when we collaborate in these
technological channels through which we communicate will soon become more
apparent. How can we find independence and more freedom in a context of
networked collaboration?

To this conference we invited the Bremen-based media critic Christoph Spehr
who coined the term 'free cooperation' in his essay "Gleicher als andere"
(More Equal Than the Other). Most of Spehr's writings are not translated
into English and this event was an opportunity to introduce his ideas into
anglophone media discourses. Spehr's writings use references to 1960s Sci-Fi
movies to think about contemporary cooperation insisting on the option of
refusal, independence, negotiation and re-negotiation with alien corporate
or state monsters. Focusing on these ideas of equality and freedom the
conference asked how they can be made useful for alternative networks of
learning and the university.

We designed the FreeCooperation conference scenario after the dramaturgical
structure of a Brechtian play. The somewhat staged environments of the event
were rather theatrical. In order to make way for new structures there it was
a crucial need to crush all hope amongst possible followers of panelism. The
mantra 'no lectures, no panels' took a long time to sink in. Yet, at the
same time the event had to be as open and participatory as possible. There
is a wide range of alternative formats one can choose from nowadays. To
state that keynotes plus panels is the only possible way of doing a
conference is pure nonsense. All it takes is the willingness to experiment,
undaunted by the prospect of failure.

At FreeCooperation, in a talk show-style session participants impersonated
sci-fi filmmakers, scientists, and "flexible personalities" and were
accompanied by musical intermezzos on Tony Conradâ??s "phonarmonica."(5)
Remote guests commented on the debate via Internet Relay Chat. In the
staging process we included an intimate talkathon (four hours, one room, two
speakers, eight people in the audience at a time), a few dialogues,
performances, a conference radio, a video conference in tandem with remote
desktop, a game about games, streamed net radio discussions, brainstorming
sessions, film screenings, a small exhibition, several workshops, a
turntabilist collaboration, and one monologue. There were no keynote
speakers and, obviously, no panels, which worked well in particular because
the topic was collaboration. We explicitly asked participants not to deliver
long lectures aiming at a more dialogical format. This approach caused
concerns for participants who usually walk on red carpets but was perfect
for those who were willing to contribute to an event, the success of a
debate as a whole, for those who could briefly present a summation of their
thoughts and are then open enough to engage in debate responding to others.

Venues at the FreeCooperation event were organized with seating in circular
shapes, no top-down auditoriums. Large gatherings like this are good
opportunities for students and other locals to create their own networks--
relationships that may become fruitful for them in the future. Here,
encounters with other students, artist friends or cultural critics may in
the end even turn out to be more formative than regimented course work.

On the outset of the organization of an event the question needs to be asked
if this is a half-day, one day, two day or week-long event or if it can
better be realized as networked program, for example on the AccessGrid (6).
Don't underestimate the amount of work that it will take: you will need
help. It's pertinent to be very clear about the pay-off for all involved--
the host institution, volunteers, participants and organizers. For us, this
event-based cultural practice was rewarding as it gave the opportunity to
highlight urgent issues, play with formats, to create discourse and
resources about online collaboration.
How can you avoid overloading individuals with work and maintain a sense of
more-or-less free cooperation in a context of next to no funding for culture
in the United States (7)? In the enthusiasm of organizing one can get
carried away and might make promises that will cause disappointments later.

Event planning needs to start early. But how early? Discussions and fund
raising should start at least one year before a large-scale event. We began
by carefully deciding on a date, cross-checking with university calendars
and public holidays. Often in US academia the planning time for big
conferences takes up to two years. The problem with organizing a new media
event in this manner is that the topics may not be as current this far
ahead. When deciding on a city for the event location does not always
matter. People are willing to travel to off-the-map places to have good
discussions. At the crux of the success of an event, however, is that all
parts of the conference take place in one location. That is not always
possible but organizers should be aware that splitting event venues gets
disorienting especially for jet-lagged international participants. They will
find it tiring to take costly taxis to get around, see which sessions start
up at what time. In addition, many sessions may be on at the same time,
which makes it hard to see what one came for and to meet other participants.

Arriving at events with hundreds or thousands of speakers, it's a
challenging task to connect with those attendees with whom one wanted to
talk for a long time. Nametags are half-concealed by bags or coats making
for a strange detective game. A simple piece of software could help here. A
Twiki (8) or proximity area network could be a space in which people can
read each others' texts before they attend the event, then being able to
jump right into the discussion after a short summation of their argument.
People would also have an easier time finding each other as photos in the
wiki, one could see where others are at a particular time during the
conference, and allow for brief exchanges to arrange meetings. This requires
attendees to prepare the conference and take part in pre-conference
exchanges still leaving things to debate for the event itself. Some
conferences use commercial social software platforms such as ORKUT (9) to
meet in. Using wireless networks one could also adapt software such as
ActiveCampus (10) or "Wifi Bedouin" (11) for personal data assistants (PDAs)
or wireless enabled laptops. Best, we should write a free/ open source
application that serves the described conference needs.
When organizing the FreeCooperation conference we were overwhelmed by the
large numbers of proposals that we received in response to our call. We read
the submissions deciding based on their relevance to what we set out to
organize. Like Phil Agre, media critic at The University of California Los
Angeles, who remarks this in a text about the organization of conferences
(12), we were uncomfortable selecting on the basis of already established
reputations in the field or nepotism because this simply re-inscribes the
circulation of a virtual class, the same voices are heard over and over. We
decided based on proposals which led us to program undergraduate students
next to established media artists and critics. We also choose participants
whom we got to know on the preparatory mailing list. The main question was
if the proposed presentation would fit into the thematic framework of the
conference. We emphasized that we look for reflection on collaboration
rather than mere descriptions of projects.

Our advice: be careful when you consider and re-consider whom to invite.
Which format suits the personality of the participant best-- a more intimate
setting of a workshop or rather the polemic format of the roundtable? Try to
imagine the best number of people for each workshop or session. This is a
difficult task when you don't know how many people will attend the overall
event. It is administratively difficult to invite international speakers in
the current political climate in the United States. We focused our finances
mainly on participants who are not employed in American academia.

When drawing a chart of the dramaturgical flow of the conference, we
oriented ourselves on the structure of Brechtian plays. A big concentration
of energy (talk show, debate-intensive sessions) was planned for the first
day, and again towards the end of the second. When setting up a list try to
have full control over it, and also to secure the list archive. Don't use
list services offered by commercial enterprises as this has the potential
for disaster (ie. unbearable amounts of advertisement are suddenly added to
posts). Shortly after we initiated the mailing list we announced that we'll
close it down a month or two after the event not intending to run this as a
mailing list beyond the conference preparation. Seven months prior to the
event the mailing list became a useful tool to enter into debate. People
briefly introduced themselves, posted texts, pointed to collaboration
theory, and collective art projects. Short posts containing one argument
seemed to best start up discussion. But, even one or two critical or hostile
voices on a mailing list can taint the overall perception of an entire
event-- a problem of list culture in general.
Funding. Ask yourself if your event really can get (or needs) outside
sponsorship. We wrote countless letters to local businesses. As a trade show
or any other corporate presence at the conference was not an option because
of the politics of the event we could have saved the energy that we put into
those applications. In US academia one has to first demonstrate that one is
dedicated and already in full gears working on the organization of an event
to get funding for it. You should consider the costs of your event carefully
and make contingency plans in case you'll get less money. Alternate plans
are also important all throughout the organizing process.

Another pivotal question in the organization of a conference or other event
is that of outcomes. What do you want the participants to take away from the
event beyond the participation experience? Positive networking and the
exchange of ideas always take place but what can you do to go beyond that?
For the FreeCooperation conference we edited a theory newspaper, simply
designed, that was launched on the first night of the event. We printed a
large number of copies, some of which participants took home with them and
the rest was distributed locally and throughout new media institutions. We
also created a DVD that besides short video impressions of the conference
sessions also included interviews with conference participants, and a video
by Christoph Spehr and Jörg Windszus. The conference website, created with
the helpful free software package Open Conference Systems (OCS) (13)
simplified some of the registration issues but was also limiting as too many
non-customizable features were based on the needs of traditional academic
conferences. The conference Wiki became a rich repository for ideas, and a
growing archive about (online) collaboration. Out of the conference emerged
the Institute for Distributed Creativity (14) and the Institute for Network
Cultures (15). We are currently editing a book on the art of (online)
collaboration that will be published by oe/b_books by the end of spring

We can't wait for the moment that complex, stable, and powerful open source
tools for presentation become available. How many times have we tried to
replace proprietary software such as 'Powerpoint' or 'Keynote' but had to
surrender as packages such as OpenOffice (16) did not have the necessary
features or were not reliable enough?

Many conference organizers, based on a few topics start to invite a range of
participants. They make sure that they are good speakers with engaging
presentations, and that they are geographically diverse (local vs.
inter/national) to avoid an isolated alien landing of a conference crew star
ship. In this balancing act between ideas, equal representation of gender,
minorities and available finances the focus on a few specific topics easily
gets lost and events become unfocused.
The challenge is to avoid the tokenism of the multicultural spectacle while
still achieving the much-needed balance. Globalization has yet to arrive in
many cultural/new media arts events. One of the ways to speed up diversity
is to question dominant organization formats and introduce basic forms of
interactivity and dialogue.

October 2004


(1) Readings, B. (1999). The University in Ruins. 4th ed. United States:
Harvard University Press.

(2) The "networks, art, and collaboration" conference, a.k.a.
FreeCooperation, took place in April 2004 at the Department of MediaStudy,
The State University of New York at Buffalo. The conference was organized by
Trebor Scholz (New York/ Buffalo) and Geert Lovink (Brisbane/Amsterdam),
assisted (in more or less free cooperation) by Dorothee Gestrich (now Banff
Centre) and Orkan Telhan (Ankara/ Buffalo), Tom Leonhardt (Toronto/ Buffalo)
and Arzu Telhan (Ankara/ Buffalo).
Trebor Scholz. (2004). networks, art, & collaboration. Freecooperation.
Available: URL Last accessed October 5, 2004.

(3) 'A weblog, or simply a blog, is a web application which contains
periodic, reverse chronologically ordered posts on a common webpage. Such a
web site would typically be accessible to any Internet user. Part of the
reason "blog" was coined and commonly accepted into use is the fact that in
saying "blog", confusion with server log is avoided.'
(2004). weblog. Wikipedia. Available: URL Last
accessed October 5, 2004.

(4) 'A Wiki or wiki (pronounced "wicky" or "weeky" or "viki") is a website
(or other hypertext document collection) that allows any user to add
content, as on an Internet forum, but also allows that content to be edited
by any other user.' (2004). weblog. Wikipedia. Available: URL Last accessed October 5, 2004.

(5) Tony Conrad's Phonarmonica is an update of Benjamin Franklin glass
armonica- an instrument that spun glass bowls and was played with finger
tips. Conrad's DJ version uses a power drill to spin a stack of 78 RPM
records at incrwsing velocity while they are played by a manual contact with
a pair of phonograph tone arms.

(6) Access Grid
The Access Gridâ?¢ is an ensemble of resources including multimedia
large-format displays, presentation and interactive environments, and
interfaces to support group-to-group interactions across the Grid.
The AccessGrid Project. AccessGrid ( Available: URL Last accessed October 5, 2004.

(7) "While France pays an average of $17 per capita on international
cultural programs, the United States spends 65 cents."
The Globalist. The Globalist| Global Diplomacy-- Europe's Soft Power.
Available: URL Last
accessed October 5, 2004.

(8) Twiki
"TWiki is a WikiWiki TWiki also enables simple form-based web applications,
without programming, and granular access control (though it can also operate
in classic 'no authentication' mode). Other enhancements include
configuration variables, embedded searches, server side includes, file
attachments and a plugin API that has spawned over 130 plugins to link into
databases, create charts, sort tables, write spreadsheets, make drawings,
track Extreme Programming projects and so on."
(2004). weblog. Wikipedia. Available: URL Last
accessed October 5, 2004.

(9) Orkut is an online community that connects people through a network of
trusted friends. We are committed to providing an online meeting place where
people can socialize, make new acquaintances and find others who share their
Orkut. Orkut. Available: URL Last accessed October 5,

(10) ActiveCampus
The ActiveCampus project aims to provide location-based services for
educational networks and understand how such systems are used. activeclass
enables collaboration between students and professors by serving as a visual
moderator for classroom interaction. ActiveCampus Explorer uses a person's
context, like location, to help engage them in campus life.
(2004). ActiveCampus. explorations in community-oriented ubiquitous
computing. Available: URL Last accessed
October 5, 2004.

(11) WiFi.Bedouin is a wearable, mobile 802.11b node disconnected from the
global Internet.
(2004). TechKwonDo. TechKwonDo__WiFiBedouin. Available: URL Last accessed October 05, 2005.

(12) Phil Agre. (1996). Notes on organizing conferences. Phil Agre's Home
Page. Available: URL Last accessed
October 5, 2004.

See also:
Geert Lovink (2002). Dark Fiber. 1st Edition Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
On Conferences and Temporary Media Labs(13) Open Conference Systems (OCS) is
a free Web publishing tool that will create a complete Web presence for your
scholarly conference.
(2004). Open Conference Systems. Open Conference Systems (OCS). Available:
URL Last accessed
October 5, 2004.

(14) Institute for Distributed Creativity (IDC)
The research of the Institute for Distributed Creativity (IDC) focuses on
collaboration in media art, technology, and theory with an emphasis on
social contexts. The IDC, founded by Trebor Scholz in May 2004, is an
international network with a participatory and flexible institutional
structure that combines advanced creative production, research, events, and
documentation. While the IDC makes appropriate use of emerging low-cost and
free social software it balances these activities with regular face-to-face
(2004). Institute for Distributed Creativity. Available: URL Last accessed October 5, 2004.

(15) Founded mid 2004 by Geert Lovink, this research institute, based at
Polytechnic/University of Amsterdam (UvA/HvA), will look into the (internal)
dynamics of online networks by organizing lectures, conferences, reseach
progams and, most of all, both offline and online collaborations.
(2004). Institute for Network Cultures. Available: URL Last accessed October 5, 2004.

(16) OpenOffice
OpenOffice's mission is to create, as a community, the leading international
office suite that will run on all major platforms and provide access to all
functionality and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based
file format. : Homepage. Open Office. Available: URL Last accessed October 5, 2004.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.02.05
From: Edward Picot <edwardpicot AT>
Subject: Payments for Web Art?

New on The Hyperliterature Exchange/trAce for February 2005 -

Should web art be free or should it be paid for? Many new media writers and
artists regard asking for payment as philosophically objectionable and a
good way to lose audience numbers. Others believe that it's just as
reasonable to ask payment for web art as to ask it for a book or a painting.
To read the views of a number of web artists on this subject, visit; or to read an article about it,
written by Edward Picot for the trAce organistion, visit

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Date: 2.04.05
From: David Senior <David_Senior AT>
Subject: Sharing = Caring

Sharing = Caring

Me+++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City.
by William J. Mitchell

The reiterated themes of William J. Mitchell¹s work Me+++ identify the
overarching trend in digital technology of shrinking objects that compose
our capability of receiving and dispersing information, of a capacity within
communication techniques to blur former boundaries of movement and vision.
The book presents an impressive list of new horizons in the development of
techniques of communication, mobility and information storage. The pattern
is replayed for the reader in various fields: of academic networks of
digital reference, digital accessories like cellular phones and wireless
laptops, universal access to GPS services and the compression of all these
tools into single handheld devices. The tone reflects an insurmountable tide
towards the merging of our tool set and the individual into an easily
accessible node within a comprehensive network architecture. Within this
architecture, the body and the techniques reflect an ambiguous figure, one
without former distinctions between where the line is drawn between the tool
and its user. This is a point however that has been reached and reiterated
consistently within the deluge of critical writing on and around the
philosophy of technology and our cyborg condition. Me+++ simply attaches
some more anecdotes on this narrative of the contemporary person and the
limitless personas of the body and thought.

What Mitchell, academic director of MIT's Program in Media Arts and
Sciences, provides for the reader, is a consideration of the technological
world at the moment and also, allusions to the trajectories of possible
developments in the future. As he states, he writes from the perspective ³of
a critically engaged designer whose business it is to reflect, imagine and
invent.² The very nature of this type of writing achieves its essential
point by just attempting to codify the moment in terms of the trends and
trajectories of our digital world. Already, this book, which was originally
published in 2003, evokes an awkwardness that any projection in regards to
the future holds in the history of technology. The danger of writing
prognostications of a future present is the pace of change that already has
outstripped the writer¹s reflections of the state of the art. The already
obsolete condition mimics that of the objects themselves, the constant
production of debris in development of new and better products, and also
reflects the condition of the unexpected in the function and dysfunction of
our technology. Inevitably, the approach to an object is flipped on its
head by an innovative gesture, an accidental move or a stubborn user. In
fact, the most dynamic condition of an object is in its role in events or
practices that are completely detached from any intention of a designer, by
destabilizing former configurations of orientation and function.

Consistently, there are depictions in the text of the body without decisive
limit, extended by the conditions of small and mobile networked
communication techniques. This is a decisive point that should be understood
in today¹s discourse on the body, and in philosophical discourse in relation
to technology and communication. Users of these new techniques have begun to
recognize the how deeply these new spaces participate in our reflection of
ourselves and the map of our complicated contemporary environment. So, as
Mitchell writes emphatically of these networks, ³Not only are these networks
essential to my physical survival, they also constitute and structure my
channels of perception and agency-my means of knowing and acting upon the
world?And they are as crucial to me as my neurons.²[ii] Such a strong
admission of one¹s dependency on our mediatized setting certainly stirs
reflection on the degree to which Mitchell is correct in his summation of
this dependency. What is more alarming given such statements is Mitchell¹s
lack of a more decisive advocacy against the forces of control in our
digital milieu. Considering such an essential relation to this architecture,
it would seem fairly important to seriously assert the dangers that are
bound to the political and economical control of access to these spaces.
Often, Mitchell positively references the figure of the nomad as the new
condition of our contemporary circumstances. This reference has been
articulated often enough to have become cliché, especially in regards to the
extent that Deleuze and Guttari¹s original work in Anti-Oedipus and A
Thousand Plateaus has been pasted on a whole menagerie of critical thought
and cultural studies discourses. In terms of Mitchell¹s use, the figure of
the nomad has no resonance as a persona of resistance. The general
characterization of a contemporary or future individual empowered by the
ability to gain quick information or access to larger communication networks
fits best with the desired qualities of contemporary business models. This
model of the mobile worker has surfaced now in the advertising and promotion
of business tools and wireless technology as the fundamental necessity for
success in the global market.

Also, the accessories of mobility highlighted in Me+++ could easily be
connected to an extension of surveillance and integration in a specific
fixed order. Here perhaps we see a more rigorous relation to the stakes of
contemporary techniques of mobility. Is it more that we are designing an
increased order of surveillance and control through the technology of
communication, imaging and identification? It simply takes a responsible
look at certain militaristic origins of technologies to relate these new
techniques to various methodologies of control and security. Central to any
discussion in this regard is the current research in biometrics and the
implications of this new horizon of biopolitical space. The consequences
seem to be less an instituted freedom of movement but more of
hyper-mobilized condition of security and zones of contained communication.
The space of the network extends out, but less in a capacity to surpass
understood borders, in a condition where we are all more intrinsically
subject to the biopolitics of contemporary society.

What then is the role of the designer in such a condition? Despite some of
his omissions in terms of the challenges which the designer faces in the
contemporary milieu, the effective message of Mitchell¹s book is his
interest in an ethic of cooperation in the production of new network
environments. The persistence of cooperation in this environment directly
opens the possibility of an innovative output of creativity and an extension
of ourselves in endless ways. The ethic enforces an ambiguity of authorship
as well as ceaseless plane of collaboration. Such a method also makes
obsolete the contemporary phenomenon of intellectual property and the
ability to own ideas. In such a scenario, the possibility exists, in its
most u-topic sense, for unexpected openings and encounters that further
complicate and dislocate, permitting a particular kind of listening to our
surroundings and the potential for strange messengers to pronounce
themselves. In this way, the space of our networked surroundings truly
becomes a frontier space in which curiosity and questioning take precedence
over any obsession with security and the precise articulation of our

- David Senior

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization and an affiliate of
the New Museum of Contemporary Art.

Rhizome Digest is supported by grants from The Charles Engelhard
Foundation, The Rockefeller Foundation, The Andy Warhol Foundation for
the Visual Arts, and with public funds from the New York State Council
on the Arts, a state agency.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Rhizome Digest is filtered by Kevin McGarry (kevin AT ISSN:
1525-9110. Volume 10, number 6. Article submissions to list AT
are encouraged. Submissions should relate to the theme of new media art
and be less than 1500 words. For information on advertising in Rhizome
Digest, please contact info AT

To unsubscribe from this list, visit
Subscribers to Rhizome Digest are subject to the terms set out in the
Member Agreement available online at

Please invite your friends to visit on Fridays, when the
site is open to members and non-members alike.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +